Legal Opinion
Michigan Consol. Gas Co. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1949No. 10834PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The controversy involves the jurisdiction of the district court to entertain -a suit for the specific performance of a contract between a pipe-line company and a distributor in view of broad regulatory powers conferred upon, the Federal Power Commission under the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S. C.A. § 717 et seq. The Federal Power Commission, various gas companies, public service commissions and others, intervened as defendants and moved for a dismissal of the complaint. The court, in a well-considered opinion, 80 F.Supp. 27, concluding that Congress had committed the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Illinois Natural Gas Co. v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Michigan Consol. Gas Co. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1948
3Cited by22 opinions
- Interstate Natural Gas Co. v. Southern California Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
- Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission (Two Cases). Pennsylvania Power Utility Commission v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Louisiana Power & Light Company v. United Gas Pipe Line Company, Federal Power Commission, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.