State v. Layne
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Law enforcement officers used a confidential informant (Cl) in a controlled purchase of methamphetamine. The State voluntarily disclosed the informant’s identity to Defendant because it intended to call her as a witness at trial. The district court then ordered the State to provide discovery about her prior work as a confidential informant. The State refused to comply with the order, and the district court entered its order prohibiting the Cl from testifying at trial. The State appeals, arguing that the district court erred in (1) ordering the discovery and (2)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. RojoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. SosaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. ForbesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- Mayeux v. WinderNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. DesnoyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. HarperNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. Le MierNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. OrtizNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. BranchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. BranchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.