Legal Opinion

State v. Forbes

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2005No. 29,111PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHÁVEZ, Justice.

{1} On March 8, 2004, the United States Supreme Court issued Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), holding that “[wjhere testimonial evidence is at issue, ... the Sixth Amendment demands what the common law required: unavailability and a prior opportunity for cross-examination.” Id. at 68, 124 S.Ct. 1354. We applied this principle in State v. Johnson, 2004-NMSC-029, ¶¶ 2, 7, 136 N.M. 348, 98 P.3d 998. Respondent, Ralph Rodney Earnest (Earnest), who in 1985 was convicted of murder, conspiracy to commit murder, kidnaping, conspiracy…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. Kersey v. HatchNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. DukesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. State v. LloydSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. State v. KennedyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API