State v. Forbes
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHÁVEZ, Justice.
{1} On March 8, 2004, the United States Supreme Court issued Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), holding that “[wjhere testimonial evidence is at issue, ... the Sixth Amendment demands what the common law required: unavailability and a prior opportunity for cross-examination.” Id. at 68, 124 S.Ct. 1354. We applied this principle in State v. Johnson, 2004-NMSC-029, ¶¶ 2, 7, 136 N.M. 348, 98 P.3d 998. Respondent, Ralph Rodney Earnest (Earnest), who in 1985 was convicted of murder, conspiracy to commit murder, kidnaping, conspiracy…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Kersey v. HatchNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. DukesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- State v. LloydSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. KennedyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.