Legal Opinion

State v. Ortiz

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 13, 2009No. 27,544PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

{1} The State appeals from the district court’s order dismissing the charges against Defendant with prejudice, in part due to the State’s failure to comply with a discovery order under Rule 5-501(A)(3) NMRA. The court determined that Defendant made a threshold showing that the discovery requested was potentially material to the defense and ordered the State to identify whether any such material evidence existed. The State chose not to comply in any manner with the district court’s order, and the court dismissed the case with prejudice. We conclude the court did not abuse…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Headley v. Morgan Management Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. Charles N. Lloyd, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  4. In re Aaron L.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. HouseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. HarperNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. Randy J.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. BranchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. BranchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. LujanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API