Legal Opinion

State v. Rojo

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1998No. 24,319PublishedCited by 450 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, J.

{1} Defendant appeals his convictions for first degree murder, tampering with evidence, and kidnapping. On appeal, Defendant asserts that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support any of his convictions; (2) the district court violated his constitutional right to be free from double jeopardy by convicting and sentencing him for both murder and kidnapping; (3) the district court erred in denying his motion to disclose the identity of a confidential informant or conduct an in camera review under Rule 11-510 NMRA 1998; (4) the district court erred in admitting hearsay…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. ApodacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by450 opinions

  1. State v. VarelaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. SwickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. CoffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. AllenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006

445 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API