State v. Rojo
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, J.
{1} Defendant appeals his convictions for first degree murder, tampering with evidence, and kidnapping. On appeal, Defendant asserts that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support any of his convictions; (2) the district court violated his constitutional right to be free from double jeopardy by convicting and sentencing him for both murder and kidnapping; (3) the district court erred in denying his motion to disclose the identity of a confidential informant or conduct an in camera review under Rule 11-510 NMRA 1998; (4) the district court erred in admitting hearsay…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. ApodacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by450 opinions
- State v. VarelaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SwickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. CoffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. AllenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
445 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.