Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Brant

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1979No. 1308PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*138HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends, inter alia,1 that the lower court erred in granting the Commonwealth’s two petitions for extension of time pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(c). We agree and, accordingly, vacate the judgment of sentence and discharge appellant.

The complaint in this case was filed on April 19, 1977. The trial did not begin until December 9, 1977, 233 days after the complaint was filed. Trial should have begun by October 17,1977, unless the period of delay beyond 180 days was either excluded under Rule 1100(d) or properly extended by court order under Rule 1100(c). The record…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EhredtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. AntonuccioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. MancusoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. McNeillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. HillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. BrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. McCantsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API