Commonwealth v. Hollingsworth
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CIRILLO, Judge:**
This case raises an issue concerning the Commonwealth’s burden of proof on a petition for an extension of time to commence trial under Pennsylvania’s speedy trial rule, Pa. R.Crim.P. 1100.
The appellant, Anna Hollingsworth, was tried by jury and convicted of maintaining lotteries and premises for illegal gambling, 18 Pa.C.S. §§ 5512, 5513. On appeal to this Court, a divided three-judge panel held that the Commonwealth had failed to prove its entitlement to an extension under Rule 1100(c), and therefore that the defendant’s right to a speedy trial had been violated; the panel…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SheltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. EhredtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KearseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. NellomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. CorbinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. DeBoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.