Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hollingsworth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 20, 1985No. 01322PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge:**

This case raises an issue concerning the Commonwealth’s burden of proof on a petition for an extension of time to commence trial under Pennsylvania’s speedy trial rule, Pa. R.Crim.P. 1100.

The appellant, Anna Hollingsworth, was tried by jury and convicted of maintaining lotteries and premises for illegal gambling, 18 Pa.C.S. §§ 5512, 5513. On appeal to this Court, a divided three-judge panel held that the Commonwealth had failed to prove its entitlement to an extension under Rule 1100(c), and therefore that the defendant’s right to a speedy trial had been violated; the panel…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SheltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. EhredtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KearseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. NellomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. CorbinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. DeBoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API