Commonwealth v. Morgan
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NIX, Justice.
Prior to trial on the instant charges appellant sought a dismissal of the indictment contending that the Common wealth had not met its obligation in bringing the matter to trial within the time required by Pa. Rule of Crim. Procedure 1100. The motion to dismiss was denied and a non-jury trial followed in which appellant was found guilty of receiving stolen property. The Rule 1100 question was raised again in post-verdict motions and before the Superior Court and on each occasion the question was decided against appellant. We granted review. 1
Since the written…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SheltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. LamonnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- State v. HoeyHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Commonwealth v. MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. Barbour, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. PolskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. LambSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.