Legal Opinion

Richards v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 14, 1993No. C2-93-596PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

This appeal concerns the definition of an underinsured motor vehicle and when an insured may recover a gap in coverage between a settlement and the tortfeasor’s policy limit.

FACTS

Appellant Rodney Lynn Richards was injured in a 1988 two-car collision. Richards had no-fault and underinsurance (UIM) coverage purchased from respondent Milwaukee Insurance Company. The driver of the other car, Michael Grosskreutz, carried $30,000 of liability coverage. Appellant agreed to settle with Grosskreutz’s insurer for $20,000, and notified Milwaukee in compliance with the requirements…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Employers Mutual Companies v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Broton v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Tuenge v. KonetskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Parr v. CloutierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richards v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Greenwaldt v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API