Legal Opinion

Tuenge v. Konetski

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 11, 1982No. 81-812PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTIS, Justice.

This is a tort action to recover damages for personal injury arising out of an automobile accident. Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the district court denying their motion for amended findings of fact and conclusions of law. At issue is the construction of the offset provision of the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act (the Act), Minn.Stat. § 65B.51, subd. 1 (1980), which provides that any tort recovery arising out of an automobile accident be reduced by the amount of basic or optional economic loss benefits paid or payable.

Plaintiff Patricia Tuenge was injured in an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Hague v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. MILBANK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. KluverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. Haugen v. Town of WalthamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Pfeffer v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Sikes v. Township of RockawayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  3. Michael Ganley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Danielson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Benson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API