Legal Opinion

Landis v. General Motors Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1956No. Appeal, 104PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ross, J.,

The sole issue in this workmen’s compensation case is whether the claimant, Richard Landis, suffered an accident during the course of his employment.

Landis was employed by the defendant-appellant as a tool and die maker. His duties consisted of repairing and assembling various jigs and dies. On February 22, 1952, working at these duties in the normal course of his employment he found it necessary to use a wrench with a ten inch long water pipe for leverage in order to tighten one of the screws. This was his normal and usual procedure in such cases. What next occurred was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Gavula v. Sims Company.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Giallonardo v. St. Joseph's CollegeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Simon v. FineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Messikomer v. Baldwin Locomotive WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Gammaitoni v. Gasparini Excavating Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Hurlburt v. Fidelity Window Cleaning Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Wance v. Gettig Engineering & Mfg. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Kracoski v. Bernice White Ash Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API