Legal Opinion

Palermo v. North East Preserving Works, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 8, 1940No. Appeal, 72PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

In this workmen’s compensation case the referee awarded compensation for total disability as the result of a hernia for a period of 14 5/7 weeks. The award was sustained by the Workmen’s Compensation Board and by the court below, and judgment was entered for claimant. The employer’s insurance carrier has appealed.

At the time appellee sustained his injury on January 18, 1938, there were no statutory requirements relating specifically to the essential proofs in hernia cases. The provisions of paragraph (g) of section 306 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1915, added by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Nesbit v. Vandervort & CurrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Witt v. Witt's Food Mkt. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Betts v. American Stores Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Schultz v. PivarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Gavula v. Sims Company.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. FrihaufWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Lambing v. Consolidation Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Rovere v. Interstate Cemetery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API