Legal Opinion

Diehl v. City of Shidler

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 10, 1945No. A-10308Published

1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, P. J.

The original opinion in this case is reported in 78 Okla. 434, 150 P. 2d 76. A rehearing was granted, and oral argument was had, and additional briefs filed by all parties.

The question presented for serious consideration by the court on rehearing is that by the terms of the ordinance it is provided that one convicted “shall be fined in any sum not less than $1.00 and not more than $19.00, and the costs of the prosecution”; and as to whether this provision renders the ordinance unconstitutional and void, for the reason that under it one might be fined more than $20, when the costs are included.

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Ex Parte BochmannCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Ex Parte MonroeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Oklahoma City v. TuckerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API