Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Monroe

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 13, 1917No. A-2888PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Application of T. J. Monroe for writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtBrett, J.

The petitioner, T. • J, Monroe, filed his. petition in this court for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging-that he was unlawfully restrained of his liberty by'W. B„ Nichols, chief of police of Oklahoma City.

The material and admitted facts are that on the 2d day of December, 1916, the petitioner was arrested by a. police-officer of Oklahoma City and charged in the police court of said city with illegally transporting intoxicating liquor; that he was tried and pronounced guilty by the police judge of spid city, without the intervention of a jury; and sentenced under and by virtue of a .city…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Thompson v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Rassmussen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Ex Parte BochmannCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Cumpton v. City of MuskogeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Blackledge v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Ex Parte DaughertyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API