Legal Opinion

People v. Roe

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 4, 1922No. Crim. No. 609PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The defendant was indicted and tried for and convicted of the crime of violating certain provisions of the act of the legislature of 1919 penalizing what is generically described by said act as “criminal syndicalism.” (Stats. 1919, p. 281.) He presented a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and the appeals are from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The defendant, for a reversal of the judgment and the order, contends: 1. That the indictment is violative of sections 950, 951, and 952 of the Penal Code, in that the purported statement therein of the act or acts…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SteelikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. People v. TomskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. McClurgIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  2. People v. McClennegenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. People v. La RueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. State v. DingmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  5. United States v. SchneidermanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API