Legal Opinion · Dissent

Board of Com'rs v. Woodford Consolidated School Dist. No. 36

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1933No. 21183Published

1DissentMcNEILL, J.

I dissent to the order of the court in refusing to grant a rehearing in this case. It is my view that the majority opinion is not correct.

This action grows out of an attempt to organize common school districts Nos. 34 and 36 of Carter county into a consolidated school district. I adopt the statement of the case in the brief of the plaintiffs in error, defendants in the trial court, as follows :

“During the month of October, 1929, petitions purporting to be signed by a majority of the legal voters of said districts Nos. 34 and 36 were presented to the county superintendent of Carter county,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wulzen v. Bd. of Supervisors of City & Cty of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. State v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. People Ex Rel. North v. . FeatherstonhaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Jordan v. JordanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Lowe v. Consolidated School Dist. No. 97Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API