State v. Ross
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Original application for mandamus by the State of Oklahoma on the relation .of S. P. Freeling, Attorney General, against Mrs. A. K. Ross, respondent.
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.
The proceedings in this case grow out of the efforts of the electors of School District No. 28, Rogers county, and School District No. 14, Tulsa county, and a portion of School District No. 17, Tulsa county, to organize a consolidated school district, under and pursuant to the provisions of art. 7, chap. 219. Session Laws 1913. The Attorney General was permitted to file the action upon a showing made meeting the requirements of rule 15 of the Supreme Court. The facts will sufficiently appear from a consideration of the several propositions involved.
It is first contended that the question…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Attorney General v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- State ex rel. Wood v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Wheeler v. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1886
- State Ex Rel. Burns v. Linn, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Board of Education of City of Ardmore v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Sharp v. Tulsa County Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Dowell v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Halstead v. McHendrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Clark v. WarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- State ex rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. FroeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.