Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Coral Gables Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided January 21, 1981No. 80-3285-Civ-SMAPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON REMAND
ARONOVITZ, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Steven and Madlyn Schultz (hereinafter “Schultz”) originally filed this action in the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, in and for Dade County, seeking declaratory relief which would, in essence, bar Defendant Coral Gables Federal Savings & Loan Association (hereinafter “Coral Gables”) from exercising certain rights under a mortgage provision known as a “due-on-sale” clause. On December 12, 1980, Coral Gables removed the action to this Court and Plaintiffs have now moved to remand the case for want of federal subject…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Schmidt v. National Organization for WomenDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1983
- Chappell v. SCA Services, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1982
- Campos v. Sociedad Aeronautica De Medellin Consolidada, S.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1994
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 639 v. Seagram Sales Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.