Legal Opinion
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 25, 1982No. Nos. 81-2115, 81-2308PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellants in these consolidated appeals assert that the district courts incorrectly determined there was no subject matter jurisdiction over their respective claims. We disagree and affirm the district courts’ conclusions that these claims are not within “federal question” jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1337.
I. BACKGROUND
This opinion discusses two appeals raising nearly identical issues. Because of the great similarity between the questions presented, the legal analysis will cover the two appeals together. The factual and procedural background…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Basf Corporation v. Darlene Symington, Next Friend or Guardian Ad Litem for Darci Symington, an IncompetentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- North Central F.S., Inc. v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
- Victor Foods, Inc. v. Crossroads Economic Development of St. Charles County, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Middle South Energy, Inc. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Robert E. Cotner v. Vincent Knight R. Michael Cody Larry A. Fields Helen Moss David Walters Susan Brimer LovingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.