Legal Opinion

Broderick v. Broderick

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1919No. Civ. No. 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

In September of 1915 appellant brought suit for separate maintenance of herself and minor daughter, alleging as the grounds of action failure to provide and extreme cruelty. In November of the same year she brought suit for divorce and custody of the minor children and all the community property upon the same ground. On motion of respondent these two causes of action were transferred from the county of Santa Clara to the county of Kings, and he answered in each action denying the allegations of cruelty and failure to provide. He also filed cross-complaints in each action, alleging extreme…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Thayer v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. People v. GallagherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arnold v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Lundy v. LundyArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  3. LeVanseler v. LeVanselerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Rogers v. RogersIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Lemberger v. LembergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API