LeVanseler v. LeVanseler
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
Each of the parties herein was awarded a divorce from the other on the ground of extreme cruelty. The court divided the community property according to the rules set out in De Burgh v. De Burgh, 39 Cal.2d 858 [250 P.2d 598]. On this appeal, the plaintiff wife contends there was no corroboration of the testimony of the defendant husband; that he was not entitled to a divorce, and that she is entitled to more than one-half of the community property .
The plaintiff testified to numerous alleged acts of cruelty on the part of defendant, among them a charge that defendant had attempted to poison…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Price v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Ruggles v. RugglesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Bush v. BushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Butler v. StrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lipka v. LipkaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Harris v. Spinali Auto Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Lu Hong v. Sing Choon HongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Simon v. SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.