Legal Opinion

Mackler v. Mississippi River & Bonne Terre Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Scott Circuit Court. — Hon. Henry C. Riley, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBond, J.

Plaintiffs allege that Charles Pardesky contracted with the St. Joseph Lead Company for the construction of a railroad belonging to the defendant; that, in the making of said contract, said St. Joseph Lead Company acted as agent or trustee of defendant; *678that plaintiffs, under a contract with said Pardesky, performed work and labor in constructing said railroad from the ninth of January, 188.9, to the fifteenth of. April, 1889; that this work was done in constructing that part of the roadbed of said railroad between station 639, plus fifty, and station 687, plus sixty; and that the work so…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Howard County v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. Chapman v. Kansas City, Clinton & Springfield RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. Gauss v. HussmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Schulenburg & Boeckler Lumber Co. v. StrimpleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Myers v. Union Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Massman Construction Co. v. Lake Lotawana Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Eau Claire-St. Louis Lumber Co. v. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Lyons v. CarterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API