Legal Opinion

Myers v. Union Electric Light & Power Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 22, 1933PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for a balance of $9,941.20 claimed to be due under a contract for clearing timber in the Bagnell Dam reservoir. Defendant set up a counterclaim of $1,015.32 for work alleged to have been done by it to complete the contract. Plaintiffs obtained a verdict of $8,450. From judgment entered therefor, defendant has appealed.

The contract sued upon was made pursuant to the following advertisement:

"Advertisement No. 41.
"At 10 A.M., November 23, 1929, at the office of the Union Electric Light and Power Company, Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation, Agents, at Bagnell Dam near…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Chapman v. Kansas City, Clinton & Springfield RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Dinsmore v. Livingston CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  4. McGregor v. J. A. Ware Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. State Ex Rel. Dolman v. DickeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Ketcham v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. State Mut. Life Assur. Co. of Worchester v. DischingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  4. Gillioz v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Ducoulombier v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API