Legal Opinion
Branch v. Mobil Oil Corp.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 10, 1991No. CIV-90-723-RPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant Atlantic Richfield Company’s (“ARCO”) alternative motions to dismiss and for summary judgment.
Based upon the alleged undisputed facts that ARCO is not an operator or owner of the Healdton One Unit and has conducted no oil and/or gas operations within the area enclosed by the boundaries of the Healdton One Unit or on any property described in Plaintiffs’ Complaint since 1968, Defendant ARCO maintains that Plaintiffs have no claim for injunctive relief or temporary damages against it as a matter of law.
Evidence submitted by…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Country Chrysler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Smith v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Loyal Order of Moose, Lodge 1785 v. CavanessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Harper-Turner Oil Company v. BridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Union Texas Petroleum Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Durham v. Herbert Olbrich GMBH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- NBI Services, Inc. v. WardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Texaco Inc. v. Berry Petroleum Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.