People v. Beltran
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
Here we clarify what kind of provocation will suffice to constitute heat of passion and reduce a murder to manslaughter. The Attorney General argues the provocation must be of a kind that would cause an ordinary person of average disposition to kill. We disagree. Nearly 100 years ago, this court explained that, when examining heat of passion in the context of manslaughter, the fundamental “inquiry is whether or not the defendant’s reason was, at the time of his act, so disturbed or obscured by some passion ... to such an extent as would render ordinary men of average…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by162 opinions
- People v. RangelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. ChismCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. ElmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.