Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Holgate

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 27, 2007No. 35506-0-IIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.

¶1 Matthew Skinner appeals from a summary judgment wherein the trial court applied the doctrine of judicial estoppel and granted summary judgment against Skinner. Skinner filed for bankruptcy but failed to disclose an estimated $1,000,000 claim against Holgate and received a discharge in bankruptcy, finding that there were no assets. Judicial estoppel is an equitable doctrine precluding a party from asserting one position in a court proceeding and later seeking advantage by taking an inconsistent position. We hold that the trial court wherein Skinner later made a claim against Holgate, after…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Lawrence Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, an Illinois Corporation David's Restaurant SupplyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Walter Burnes v. Pemco AeroplexCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  5. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wellman & Zuck, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. Advocates for Responsible Development v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. Harris v. FortinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Hudson v. HapnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. CHD, INC. v. TaggartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API