Skinner v. Holgate
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.
¶1 Matthew Skinner appeals from a summary judgment wherein the trial court applied the doctrine of judicial estoppel and granted summary judgment against Skinner. Skinner filed for bankruptcy but failed to disclose an estimated $1,000,000 claim against Holgate and received a discharge in bankruptcy, finding that there were no assets. Judicial estoppel is an equitable doctrine precluding a party from asserting one position in a court proceeding and later seeking advantage by taking an inconsistent position. We hold that the trial court wherein Skinner later made a claim against Holgate, after…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Lawrence Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, an Illinois Corporation David's Restaurant SupplyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Walter Burnes v. Pemco AeroplexCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wellman & Zuck, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Advocates for Responsible Development v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Harris v. FortinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Hudson v. HapnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- CHD, INC. v. TaggartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.