Legal Opinion
Advocates for Responsible Development v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 2, 2010No. 38721-2-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Deren, C.J.
¶1 John E. Diehl and Advocates for Responsible Development (ARD), an unincorporated nonprofit association of which he is the president, both appeal a decision by the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board (WWGMHB), arguing, among other things, that WWGMHB erred when it ruled that Diehl lacked personal standing to assert the same claims that he asserted as ARD’s president. We affirm. Without personal standing, we do not reach the merits of Diehl’s arguments. And because Diehl, who is not a lawyer, cannot represent ARD in court, we dismiss ARD’s appeal.1
FACTS
¶2 In 2006, ARD…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Jones v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re America West Airlines, Debtor. Seymour Licht v. America West Airlines Equity Security Holders CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cottringer v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- No On I-502, Arthur West v. NormlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Advocates for Responsible Development v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Shaw Family, LLC v. Advocates for Responsible DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Advocates for Responsible Dev't v. WwgmhbCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.