Legal Opinion

Keesun Partners v. Ferdig Oil Co., Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1991No. 90-517PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

The appellants, Ferdig Oil Company, Inc. and Somont Oil Co., Inc. (referred to collectively as Ferdig/Somont), appeal from an order of the District Court of the Ninth Judicial District, Toole County, granting partial summary judgment in favor of the respondent, Keesun Partners. We affirm.

Ferdig/Somont raises the following issues on appeal:

1. Did the District Court err in determining that there are no genuine issues of material fact as to the absence of a contract between the parties?

2. Did the District Court err in holding that even if a contract did exist between the parties, its enforcement…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frigon v. Morrison-Maierle, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hando v. PPG Industries, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Keil v. Glacier Park, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Chadwick v. GibersonMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. O'BAGY v. First Interstate BankMontana Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kortum-Managhan v. HERBERGERS NBGLMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Payne Realty & Housing, Inc. v. First Security BankMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Lenz v. FSC SecuritiesMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Conagra, Inc. v. NierenbergMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Global Client Solutions, LLC v. OsselloMontana Supreme Court · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API