Legal Opinion

Conagra, Inc. v. Nierenberg

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 2000No. 99-138PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶ 1 ConAgra, Inc., d/b/a Peavey Company (ConAgra) appeals from a judgment issued by the Ninth Judicial District Court, Toole County, in favor of Ralph and Dennis Nierenberg (Nierenbergs), following a non-jury trial. We reverse.

¶2 ConAgra raises the following issues:

1. Did the District Court err by finding and concluding that Dennis Nierenberg, as an agent for the Nierenbergs, did not admit making a contract to sell wheat to ConAgra?

2. Did the District Court err by concluding that the Nierenbergs did not receive written confirmation of the sale and purchase of their grain within a reasonable…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Northern Indiana Public Service Company, an Indiana Corporation v. Carbon County Coal Company, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Story v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Griffin v. Superior Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Grynberg v. Citation Oil & Gas Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Plath v. SchonrockMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Arrowhead Sch. Dist. 75, Park Co. v. KlyapMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Reyburn Lawn & Landscape Designers, Inc. v. Plaster Development Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Weaver v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Andersen v. SchenkMontana Supreme Court · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API