Legal Opinion
Fuessel v. Cadillac Bar Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 31, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
63 N.J. Super. 430 (1960)
164 A.2d 821
RUDOLPH FUESSEL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CADILLAC BAR CORP. AND JOHN PANASOWICH, ALSO KNOWN AS JOHN PANN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 24, 1960.
Decided October 31, 1960.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and FREUND.
Mr. Edward A. Costigan argued the cause for defendants-appellants.
Mr. Nathan N. Finkle, argued the cause pro se.
The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.
Defendant Panasowich appeals from the award by the Mercer County Court of a judgment against him in the sum of $2,109 with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- H. & H. Ranch Homes, Inc. v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Artale v. Columbia Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
- Levy v. Public Service Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
- Ferraro v. City Hall GarageSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
- American Automobile Ins. Co. v. NiebuhrNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Musikoff v. Jay Parrino's the Mint, L.L.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Nickel Rim Mines Ltd. v. Universal-Cyclops Steel Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1962
- Adco Service, Inc. v. Graphic Color PlateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Horowitz v. WeishoffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Schepisi & McLaughlin v. LoFaroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013