Legal Opinion

Levy v. Public Service Railway Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 4, 1918PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

This is a proceeding under the Attorney’s Lien act of 1914 (Pamph. L., p. 410), which is as follows:

“After the service of a summons and complaint in any action at Law, or the filing of a bill of complaint or petition in the Court of Chancery, or the service of an answer containing a counter-claim in any action at law, the attorney, solicitor or counsellor at law who shall appear in said cause for such party instituting the action at law, or suit, or filing the petition, or counter-claim, shall have a lien for compensation, upon his client’s…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fuessel v. Cadillac Bar Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Nickel Rim Mines Ltd. v. Universal-Cyclops Steel Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1962
  3. James v. HarrisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Windsor Contr. Corp. v. BudnyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  5. Chasan v. KolbNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API