Legal Opinion
Nickel Rim Mines Ltd. v. Universal-Cyclops Steel Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 9, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 775-58PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AUGELLI, District Judge.
The sole remaining question to be decided in this case is whether or not an attorney from a foreign jurisdiction who, pursuant to Rule 2(c) of the General Rules of this court, has been permitted to appear and participate in said action, may assert a lien for services under N.J.S.A. 2A:13-5.
The New Jersey statute dealing with attorneys’ liens provides:
“After the filing of a complaint * * * the attorney * * *, who shall appear in the cause for the party instituting the action * * *, shall have a lien for compensation, upon his client’s action, cause of action, claim * *…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cooper v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Sarnoff v. CiagliaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- In re SebringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Barnes v. VerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boswell v. Zephyr Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Neely v. Hollywood Marine, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
- Balestriere PLLC v. BanxCorpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Smith v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1963
- Balestriere PLLC v. BanxCorpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012