McGinnis v. R. M. Rigby Printing Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. T. J. See-horn, Special Judge. (1) The court erred in refusing the instructions in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence, offered at the close of plaintiff’s case and again at the close of all the evidence. (2) The court erred in giving instructions one and two, and each of them asked by the plaintiff. Thompson v. Railroad, 111 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. T. J. See-horn, Special Judge. (1) The court erred in refusing the instructions in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence, offered at the close of plaintiff’s case and again at the close of all the evidence. (2) The court erred in giving instructions one and two, and each of them asked by the plaintiff. Thompson v. Railroad, 111 Mo. App. 465. (3) The court erred in refusing to give defendant’s refused instructions 1, 2, 3 and 4, and each of them. Cordage Co. v. Miller, 126 Fed. 495; Thompson v. Railroad, 111 Mo. App. 474; Roberts v. Graham, 6 Wall.…
1Opinion of the CourtBroaddus, P. J.
The defendant, a corporation, was the owner and operator of a printing establishment in Kansas City, Missouri, and had in its employ a large number of persons including the plaintiff. In conducting its business, it maintained and operated an extensive equipment of machinery, which was driven by electrical power. The petition states: That on the 7th day of May, 1902, plaintiff was employed as a helper in said business in handling and assorting unbound printed books, preparatory for. them being bound; that on said day she was put to work at a table assorting unbound books; that beyond said…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- City of Chicago v. PowersIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Lore v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- McPherson v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Sheperd v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- McLaughlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marvel Schillie, Administratrix of the Estate of Marion Schillie, Deceased v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Federal Lead Co. v. SwyersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. ArmuthIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Miniea v. St. Louis Cooperage Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Brannock v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.