Miniea v. St. Louis Cooperage Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. William B. Homer, Judge. (1) The petition in this case is based upon section 3 of an Act of April 20, 1891 (Laws 1891, p. 162, now Sec. 7828, R. S. 1909), as amended in 1909, Laws 1909, p. 502. (a) The Act of April 20', 1891, has been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court on the ground that more than one subject is covered by the act, and that for that reason the statute is unconstitutional and void under the…
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. William B. Homer, Judge. (1) The petition in this case is based upon section 3 of an Act of April 20, 1891 (Laws 1891, p. 162, now Sec. 7828, R. S. 1909), as amended in 1909, Laws 1909, p. 502. (a) The Act of April 20', 1891, has been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court on the ground that more than one subject is covered by the act, and that for that reason the statute is unconstitutional and void under the provisions of section 28 of article IV of the Constitution of Missouri. Williams v. Railroad, 233 Mo. 666. This act therefore…
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
This is an action for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff while in the employ of defendant, as its servant. The defendant is engaged in the business of manufacturing barrels and other cooperage wares in the city of St. Louis, and plaintiff was injured while working about what is called a trussing machine, used for tightening hoops upon barrels. Plaintiff recovered, and the defendant has appealed.
The action is based upon section 7828, Revised Statutes 1909, being one of the sections of what is known as the Factory Act. This section is as follows: “The belting, shafting, machines,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lore v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Campbell v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Huss v. Heydt Bakery Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Simpson v. Witte Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- Standley v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Austin v. Bluff City Shoe Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Minea v. St. Louis Cooperage Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Mabe Ex Rel. Mabe v. Gille Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1925
- Tatum v. Crescent Laundry Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1919
- Curtright v. RuehmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.