Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. Armuth

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1913No. 22,535PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From Superior Court of Marion County (82,285); Joseph Collier, Judge. Action by Henry F. Armuth against the Cincinnati, Hamilton and Dayton Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

Action by appellee against appellant for personal injuries while working in appellant’s machine shop in Indiana. Complaint in one paragraph and answer in general denial. The errors assigned are predicated on error in overruling appellant’s motion for judgment non obstante, and in overruling its motion for a new trial. Appellee’s injury was occasioned by his hand slipping from a lever ■with which the motion of a drill was controlled, into an alleged unguarded iron gearing which it is alleged could have been guarded at small cost without impairing its practical usefulness. The jury found in…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Laidlaw v. . SageNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Davis v. Mercer Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. HussIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GillespieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Pitcairn v. WhitesideIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Consolidated Arizona Smelting Co. v. EgichArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Indiana Pipe Line Co. v. ChristensenIndiana Supreme Court · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API