Legal Opinion

Raff v. Maggio

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided August 23, 1990No. CV 89-3235PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEXLER, District Judge.

David Raff (“plaintiff”) initiated this action to recover fees with respect to his service as arbitrator in connection with a labor dispute. Defendant Maggio, as the employer involved with the arbitrated labor dispute, is liable for half the cost of the arbitrator’s fees pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement. Currently before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. After a brief recitation of the facts, the Court will address the motions.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendant is the sole proprietor of a skilled nursing home facility in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Raff v. MaggioDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
  2. Ertel v. National Fire Adjustment Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1993
  3. In Re: WhaleCo/Potter Handy Data Privacy Mass Actions; In Re: WhaleCo Inc. Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
  4. In Re: WhaleCo/Potter Handy Data Privacy Mass Actions; In Re: WhaleCo Inc. Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
  5. Pelczar v. PelczarDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API