Legal Opinion

Raff v. Maggio

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 16, 1990No. CV 89-3235PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WEXLER, District Judge.

In the above-referenced case, defendant objects to a judgment entered by this Court, dated September 13, 1990. That judgment reflected the amount of $3,954.00 as attorneys’ fees awarded to plaintiff in this action. See Raff v. Maggio, 743 F.Supp. 147 (E.D.N.Y.1990). Since the court inadvertently entered the proposed judgment prior to receiving defendant’s objections, the Court addresses them now.

First, defendant asserts that the amount of attorneys’ fees in the judgment contradicts an amount quoted by plaintiff’s counsel in a letter sent to defendant in October of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lew Wenzel & Company of Southern California, Inc. v. London Litho Supply Co., Inc., and Counterclaimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. Raff v. MaggioDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coppola v. MacKDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
  2. Fleming v. MartinDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API