Legal Opinion

Tamborino v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1986No. L.A. 32007PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, J.

In this case, evidence of a narcotics violation was discovered and seized by a police officer while he was walking through defendants’ apartment investigating a robbery report. Defendants unsuccessfully moved to suppress the evidence on the ground that it was seized during an unreasonable, warrantless search of the apartment. As will appear, we hold that the limited “walk-through” search was conducted under exigent circumstances excusing the officer from first obtaining a search warrant.

Defendants Tamborino and Smith are charged with possessing cocaine for the purpose of sale…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lewis L. Wayne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  3. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. LeybaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hsien I. Peng v. Mei Chin Penghu Jonathan Hu S. Gage, Los Angeles County Deputy, Badge No. 406857, Sued IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. People v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. MitzelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. TroyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API