Legal Opinion
People v. Troyer
California Supreme Court
Decided February 22, 2011No. S180759PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
“[T]he ‘physical entry of the home is the chief evil against which the wording of the Fourth Amendment is directed.’ ” (Payton v. New York (1980) 445 U.S. 573, 585 [63 L.Ed.2d 639, 100 S.Ct. 1371].) Thus, “searches and seizures inside a home without a warrant are presumptively unreasonable.” (Id. at p. 586.) “Nevertheless, because the ultimate touchstone of the Fourth Amendment is ‘reasonableness,’ the warrant requirement is subject to certain exceptions.” (Brigham City v. Stuart (2006) 547 U.S. 398, 403 [164 L.Ed.2d 650, 126 S.Ct. 1943].) In particular, “law enforcement…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- People v. MilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. MacabeoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Goben v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. OviedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. WernerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.