Legal Opinion
Wood v. Standard Wholesale Phosphate Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 5, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (GOR-JEE, J.). Action by Henry H. Wood against the Standard Wholesale Phosphate Company, also doing business under the name ■of the Standard Guano Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. The causé was argued before B'oyd, C. J., Bets cok-, Thomas, IJrwer, Stocicbridge, Adkiws, and Ofeutt, JJ.
1Opinion of the CourtStocicbridge, J.
This is a suit for broker’s commission upon a sale of acid phosphate. The foundation for it arose from two contracts; the first, dated October 23rd, 1916, and the second, November 1st, 1916. The first contract was as follows:
“Baltimore, Maryland, October 23rd, 1916.
“Sold to Messrs. Hollingshurst & Company, Inc., of London, England, and New York, for account of Standard Wholesale Phosphate Company of Baltimore, Maryland:
“Quantity and Guarantee.
“Twelve thousand (12,000) tons of acid phosphate made from restored acid, to be in good mechanical condition, milled and screened, analysis guaranteed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kimberly v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
- Attrill v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
- Riggs v. TurnbullCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
- Stokes v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
- Parker v. PowerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ricker v. AbramsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Childs v. RagoneseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- M. De Matteo Construction Co. v. Maine Turnpike AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1960
- Thomas v. Hudson Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Mullineaux v. VoltzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.