Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Hudson Motor Car Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 12, 1961No. [No. 32, September Term, 1961.]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHbndbrson, J.

This appeal is from a judgment entered for the defendant, Hudson, after the trial court had directed a verdict for the defendant. The case had been instituted to recover $66,000 allegedly due under a contract dated September 25, 1950, whereby the appellant was to receive a commission of $5.50 per ton upon 12,000 tons of steel, to be manufactured and delivered to Hudson by Industrial Forge and Steel Co. of Canton, Ohio. A writ of attachment was served on Hudson Sales Corporation, a Michigan corporation, by service on the State Tax Commission. On a prior appeal, we held the writ good. Thomas v.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bryant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Proctor Electric Co. v. ZinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. Thomas v. Hudson Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  4. National School Studios, Inc. v. MealeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. New York & Baltimore Transportation Line & Southern Pacific Co. v. Lewis Baer & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Castiglione v. Johns Hopkins HospitalCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Allstate Insurance v. StinebaughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Bauman v. WoodfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Edell & Associates v. Law Offices of Peter AngelosDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API