Legal Opinion

Citizens for Responsible & Organized Planning v. Chelan County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 10, 2001No. 17795-5-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Meaningful appellate review requires entry of adequate and detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law. See Org. to Pres. Agric. Lands v. Adams County, 128 Wn.2d 869, 882, 913 P.2d 793 (1996) (“review is limited to determining whether substantial evidence supports the findings and, if so, whether the findings in turn support the trial court’s conclusions of law”). Here, the Chelan County Board of Commissioners (Board) adopted findings and conclusions prepared by the planning staff which do not address the central question presented by the parties — whether the proposed residential…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Noble Manor Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Noble Manor Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Buechel v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of CamasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Peste v. Mason CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. Attorney General's Office v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Peste v. Mason CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Griffin v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API