Legal Opinion

Noble Manor Co. v. Pierce County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1997No. 64053-0PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

— Pierce County asks this Court to construe the meaning of the statute which extended the "vested rights doctrine” to applications for short subdivisions. We conclude that upon the submission of a complete application for a short subdivision, the applicant has the right to have that application, including both the request to divide and the request to develop the land, considered under the zoning and land use laws in effect on the date of the application. We affirm the Court of Appeals.

FACTS

In 1990, the Noble Manor Company, a Washington corporation (hereafter Developer) purchased approximately…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vashon Island Committee for Self-Government v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. West Main Associates v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State Ex Rel. Ogden v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Coburn v. SedaWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Erickson & Associates, Inc. v. McLerranWashington Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Quadrant Corp. v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Quadrant Corp. v. STATE, GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BD.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Ravenscroft v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API