Valley View Village, Inc. v. Proffett
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Circuit Judge.
The question presented on this appeal is a novel one. Can a noncharter municipality in the State of Ohio validly adopt a zoning ordinance which puts the entire area of the municipality into a single use district? The trial court answered this question in the negative and enjoined the appellant municipality from enforcing such an ordinance so as to prohibit appellees’ sand and gravel operations, D.C., 123 F.Supp. 339.
*414Appellant Valley View, Ohio, is a sparsely settled residential and agricultural village, situated about eight miles southeast of Cleveland. Approximately…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pritz v. MesserOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- Town of Seekonk v. John J. McHale & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Town of Lexington v. Menotomy Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Proffett v. Valley View Village, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1953
3Cited by10 opinions
- Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Fanale v. Borough of Hasbrouck HeightsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Pascack Ass'n, Ltd. v. Mayor & Coun. Washington Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Bartolomeo v. Town of Paradise ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Cadoux v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.