State v. McNeal
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 — John Kevin McNeal appeals his resentencing on remand for vehicular assault, vehicular homicide, and possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver.1 He argues that the resentencing court erred when *781it (1) applied RCW 69.50.408, which allowed it “to double”2 the statutory maximum for his drug offense; (2) concluded that Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 301, 124 S. Ct. 2531, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004), did not apply on remand; and (3) imposed exceptional sentences based on judicial factual findings rather than on factual findings by a jury. He asks us to order the trial…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. ToneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. ToneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. ApplegateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. ApplegateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. McNealCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.