Legal Opinion

State v. McNeal

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 23, 2008No. 35423-3-IIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — John Kevin McNeal appeals his resentencing on remand for vehicular assault, vehicular homicide, and possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver.1 He argues that the resentencing court erred when *781it (1) applied RCW 69.50.408, which allowed it “to double”2 the statutory maximum for his drug offense; (2) concluded that Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 301, 124 S. Ct. 2531, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004), did not apply on remand; and (3) imposed exceptional sentences based on judicial factual findings rather than on factual findings by a jury. He asks us to order the trial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ToneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. State v. ToneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. State v. ApplegateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. State v. ApplegateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. State v. McNealCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API