State v. Applegate
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.
¶1 Shortly before Ronald Applegate’s 2004 trial, the United States Supreme Court invalidated exceptional sentences based upon aggravating factors found by a judge and ruled such factors must be submitted to the trier of fact. Washington’s Sentencing Reform Act of 19811 (SRA) did not then authorize the court to submit aggravating factors for jury determination. Correctly anticipating such an amendment, Applegate’s trial judge submitted aggravating factors to the jury. The SRA now permits courts to submit aggravating factors for jury determination no matter when a defendant’s original trial or…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. PillatosWashington Supreme Court · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. DeLeonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. ApplegateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. ApplegateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Personal Restraint Petition Of: Patrick Lee SargentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.