Legal Opinion

State v. McNeal

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 25, 2010No. 38014-5-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

¶1 In a previous appeal, we remanded to the trial court for resentencing based on Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S. Ct. 2531, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004). We later accepted discretionary review1 when the sentencing court certified to us the following question: “Whether the [sentencing] Court [on remand] has jurisdiction to impanel a jury pursuant to RCW 9.94A.537(2) for the purpose of considering an aggravating factor not specifically contained in RCW 9.94A.535(3).” Clerk’s Papers (CP) at 15. Defendant John McNeal argues that if the sentencing court lacked the authority to impanel a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Oregon v. IceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. EdvaldsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  2. State v. ParmeleeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. State v. EdvaldsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. In re Marriage of HaukWashington Supreme Court · 2026
  5. Personal Restraint Petition Of: Patrick Lee SargentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API