Legal Opinion
Brunzell Construction Co. v. Harrah's Club
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 1964No. Civ. 27678PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal from an order which grants the motion of Harrah’s Club to quash and set aside the service of summons and complaint.
The complaint filed on June 11, 1962, sets forth among other things that plaintiff (hereinafter sometimes referred to as Brunzell), a Nevada corporation, on January 9, 1962, made a written contract with Harrah’s Club, a corporation, for the construction of a casino building in Reno, Nevada. Several other defendants are joined in the action, among such being William C. Wagner, Robert Raimist, William Harrah, Dames & Moore, a partnership, Vernon A. Smoot, Trent R.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Fisher Governor Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brunzell Construction Co. v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Brunzell Construction Co. v. Harrah's ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- BRUNZELL CONSTR. CO., INC. v. Harrah's ClubNevada Supreme Court · 1965
- Mathes v. National Utility Helicopters Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Agalite-Bronson Co. v. KG LimitedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.