Legal Opinion

Edward H. Holt v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 17, 1971No. 195-70PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PICKETT, Circuit Judge.

In this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding appellant Holt seeks to vacate a judgment and sentence entered on his plea of nolo contendere to 2 counts of a 21-count indictment charging him with violation of the Mail Fraud Statutes, 18 U.S.C. § 1341. The plea was entered on October 28, 1968. The basis of the motion is that the district court, prior to accepting the plea, failed to comply with the provisions of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The district court found from an examination of the record that Holt had been “fully advised of the charges against him…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Halliday v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Clyde W. Jenkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  4. Robert John Wolcott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  5. Ralph Raymond Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Edward Lee ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. Earnest Dean SandersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API