Legal Opinion

United States v. Earnest Dean Sanders

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 22, 1970No. 279-70_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PICKETT, Circuit Judge.

This is a direct appeal from a sentence entered after a plea of guilty by appellant Sanders to a 2-count indictment charging him and others with conspiring to violate 21 U.S.C. § 174, and 26 U.S.C. §§ 4705(a) and 7237(b), relating to the possession, distribution and sale of narcotic drugs. The sole contention presented is whether the plea of guilty is void because the sentencing court did not comply with the provisions of Rule 11, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, prior to accepting the guilty plea.

When Sanders appeared before the court for arraignment on March 12,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Edward H. Holt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. James CodyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. Edward Lee ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  3. Charles Thomas Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Roy Milton BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. David Lee TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API